web/fens_FabLab_Design_Metadata/traduction.php
changeset 220 42aeb2bfc58e
equal deleted inserted replaced
219:66fa89a3d42c 220:42aeb2bfc58e
       
     1 <?php
       
     2 
       
     3 $french['ExplicationPT'] = "
       
     4                     l’Institut de recherche et d’innovation (Iri) vous a proposé une expérimentation et une démonstration d’un dispositif d’annotation polémique basé sur twitter.
       
     5 					Cette qualification de vos tweets nous a permis de créer une timeline polemique représentant les positions de 
       
     6 					l'auditoire durant la conférence.
       
     7 					<br/><br/>
       
     8 					Cette syntaxe polémique vous a premis de prendre position relativement à l’intervenant ou aux autres participants au débat : 
       
     9 					<table>
       
    10 						<tr><td><a id='positive' title='accord' class='tweetButton'>++</a> </td><td>correspond à un tweet d’assentiment</td></tr>
       
    11 						<tr><td><a id='negative' title='désaccord' class='tweetButton'>--</a></td><td> à un tweet de désaccord,</td></tr>
       
    12 						<tr><td><a id='reference' title='reference' class='tweetButton'>==</a></td><td> à un tweet de référence</td></tr>
       
    13 						<tr><td><a id='question'  title='question' class='tweetButton'> ??</a></td><td> à une question</td></tr>
       
    14 					</table>
       
    15 					Suite a cette phase d’annotation, vous trouverez à droite de ce texte <b>la version alpha</b> de l'interface de navigation et de représentation de la polémique durant la conférence.
       
    16 					<br/>
       
    17 					Ce dispositif, outre qu’il approfondit la dimension critique de la discussion avec la salle et les auditeurs présents ou distants, permet ainsi également de pérenniser et de valoriser les commentaires produits en les rendant accessibles en temps différé lors de tout visionnage ultérieur de la vidéo 
       
    18 					";
       
    19                               
       
    20 $english['ExplicationPT'] = "
       
    21 					Institute for Research and Innovation (IRI) proposed to you an
       
    22 					experiment and a demonstration of a controversial annotation device
       
    23 					based on twitter. Classifying your tweets allowed us to create a
       
    24 					timeline representing the polemical positions of the audience during
       
    25 					the conference.
       
    26 					<br/><br/>
       
    27 					This controversy tracking syntax enabled you to take position on the
       
    28 					speaker or other participants points of view in the debate:
       
    29 
       
    30 					<table>
       
    31 					<tr><td><a id='positive' title='agree' class='tweetButton'>
       
    32 					++ 		</a> </td><td>corresponds to a tweet of assent</td>
       
    33 					</tr><tr><td><a id='negative' title='disagree' class='tweetButton'>
       
    34 					--  	</a> </td><td>to a tweet of disagreement,</td>
       
    35 					</tr><tr><td><a id='reference' title='reference' class='tweetButton'>
       
    36 					== 		</a> </td><td>to a tweet of reference</td>
       
    37 					</tr><tr><td><a id='question' title='question' class='tweetButton'>
       
    38 					??  	</a> </td><td>to a question</td>
       
    39 					</tr></table>
       
    40 
       
    41 					Following this annotation phase, you will find right to the present
       
    42 					text the alpha version of the browser and controversy representation
       
    43 					interface.
       
    44 					<br/><br/>
       
    45 					This device, in addition to deepening the critical dimension of the
       
    46 					discussion with the present or distant audience, allows also to
       
    47 					perpetuate and promote the published comments by making them
       
    48 					accessible at any time deferred later viewing of the video
       
    49 					";
       
    50                 
       
    51 $japan["ExplicationPT"] = "
       
    52 				Institute for Research and Innovation (IRI) proposed to you an
       
    53 				experiment and a demonstration of a controversial annotation device
       
    54 				based on twitter. Classifying your tweets allowed us to create a
       
    55 				timeline representing the polemical positions of the audience during
       
    56 				the conference.
       
    57 				<br/><br/>
       
    58 				This controversy tracking syntax enabled you to take position on the
       
    59 				speaker or other participants points of view in the debate:
       
    60 
       
    61 				<table>
       
    62 				<tr><td><a id='positive' title='agree' class='tweetButton'>
       
    63 				++ 		</a> </td><td>corresponds to a tweet of assent</td>
       
    64 				</tr><tr><td><a id='negative' title='disagree' class='tweetButton'>
       
    65 				--  	</a> </td><td>to a tweet of disagreement,</td>
       
    66 				</tr><tr><td><a id='reference' title='reference' class='tweetButton'>
       
    67 				== 		</a> </td><td>to a tweet of reference</td>
       
    68 				</tr><tr><td><a id='question' title='question' class='tweetButton'>
       
    69 				??  	</a> </td><td>to a question</td>
       
    70 				</tr></table>
       
    71 
       
    72 				Following this annotation phase, you will find right to the present
       
    73 				text the alpha version of the browser and controversy representation
       
    74 				interface.
       
    75 				<br/><br/>
       
    76 				This device, in addition to deepening the critical dimension of the
       
    77 				discussion with the present or distant audience, allows also to
       
    78 				perpetuate and promote the published comments by making them
       
    79 				accessible at any time deferred later viewing of the video
       
    80 				";
       
    81 
       
    82 ?>